• | 9:00 am

Exclusive: Big Philanthropy teams up to take on Big AI

A new coalition of 10 major givers, including the Omidyar Network and Ford Foundation, are investing $500 million in an effort to ensure Americans have a say in how artificial intelligence impacts them.

Exclusive: Big Philanthropy teams up to take on Big AI
[Source photo: Yana Iskayeva/Getty Images; Jonathan Kitchen/Getty Images]

Ten major philanthropic organizations are banding together to ensure that regular Americans, not just a small group of tech billionaires, have a say in how AI will shape society and who will benefit. The organizations announced Tuesday the formation of Humanity AI, a $500-million five-year initiative aimed at ensuring artificial intelligence serves people and communities rather than replacing or diminishing them.

The coalition includes the Doris Duke Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Mellon Foundation, the Mozilla Foundation, the Omidyar Network, and other philanthropies. The core group, which is expected to expand to include other philanthropies, will make the grants both on their own (with input from the group) and together from a common pool of capital.

Many now believe that generative AI systems are about to revolutionize the way companies do business, from accounting to engineering to operations. Humanity AI is betting on a future where AI plays a supporting role, wherein it “strengthens communities, and enhances human creativity.”

The groups want to rebalance the public policy conversation around AI to include the interests of normal people, not just the big tech players and financiers who are betting big on the transformative potential of the technology.

“So much investment is going into AI right now with the goal of making money, which is our capital system and that’s all fine,” MacArthur Foundation president John Palfrey said in an interview with Fast Company. “What we are seeking to do is to invest public interest dollars to ensure that the development of the technology serves humans and places humanity at the center of this development.”

The coalition knows it won’t be able to match the AI industry’s cash—its $500 million is a quarter Mira Murati’s seed round for Thinking Machines Lab. Palfrey says that even if his organization would put its entire $9 billion in assets into this one issue, it wouldn’t come close to the money being invested by the tech companies and their investors.

But, he says, the 10 organizations in Humanity AI working together could have a real impact. “We each have a slightly different angle on it, but we’re going to share knowledge and hopefully have the whole be greater than the sum of the parts,” he says.

The goal, after all, is not to compete with the tech industry so much as it is to expand the conversation. “It’s all building a broader community of folks who are engaged in this topic,” Omidyar Network president Michele Jawando tells Fast Company. “[T]here’s just one or two people who are saying this is how [AI] should be used, and we’re saying, ‘Hey, wait a minute. I’m going to pull up a few more chairs at the table and get a few different voices and perspectives’.”

Workers are increasingly worried that the real “value” that AI companies and their investors hope to deliver to big business is the ability to eliminate positions and cut payroll. AI companies and their backers counter by saying that some positions will be eliminated but that many kinds of jobs will be created. Creatives and artists wonder whether AI will enhance their performance or replace them, and many question how their authentic intellectual property can be protected in a world of AI-generated content.

But the private sector would actually benefit by making sure that the benefits of AI are broadly distributed across geographies and classes, Jawando points out. “Because if people don’t see that, we’ve seen what happens when people feel completely on the outside and used and abused,” she says. “Every major industrial revolution has had [that] moment, and so the private sector should be incentivized to do this, but they’re not right now.”

Some of the investments Humanity AI plans to make focus on giving underrepresented people ways to influence AI’s trajectory. The group plans to award funds to the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), which works to protect people’s right to data privacy as tech companies (and governments) work to bend norms toward having no expectation of privacy at all.

The group also plans to fund the work of the Berkeley Labor Center, which develops technology to measure the real effects of AI on the workforce. In addition, it trains union organizers and labor advocates and other organizations that support them, so that workers can act as decision-makers on how AI gets applied and not just passive participants (or victims) of the way AI is deployed in the workplace.

Some of the group’s funding targets are more politically focused, working to raise the voices of people who will be affected by AI but lack the lobbying firepower of big tech. The public advocacy group AI Now, for example, seeks to inject into the policy debate the idea that the corporations developing AI should have to be accountable to the public. The group provides technical expertise to lawmakers (who often rely on AI industry sources), and researches and develops an intellectual framework that legitimizes public intervention in AI development.

Some of the members of Humanity AI are focused on the creative industries. Omidyar’s Jawando says one of the projects Humanity AI wants to fund is focused on preserving the intellectual property of human creatives, and giving people like actors technology tools to stay in control of their image and work when generative AI tools can easily duplicate and remix them and post the results on social media.

At a deeper level, Jawando says, society is beginning to grapple with the question of what role AI should play in society. Should it support and amplify people, or should it stand in for (or replace) people in many tasks?

AI might be better used to address problems like healthcare accessibility or housing availability rather than making sure we all have better access to Canva, Jawando told me. “I think this is when you have the conversation about human flourishing—I think it comes down to that level of detail and thoughtfulness.”

Humanity AI wants to find, and fund, people who share that worldview and speak that language. “We want to raise up a whole group of scientists and academics and researchers and advocates and young people who are going to raise these issues,” she says, “so that you can then empower the policymakers [to] incentivize the private sector folks to do the right thing . . .”

Humanity AI partners will begin making grants as soon as fall 2025. Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors will serve as a fiscal sponsor and manage a pooled fund, with grants from that fund beginning in 2026.

  Be in the Know. Subscribe to our Newsletters.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark Sullivan is a senior writer at Fast Company, covering emerging tech, AI, and tech policy. Before coming to Fast Company in January 2016, Sullivan wrote for VentureBeat, Light Reading, CNET, Wired, and PCWorld More

More Top Stories:

FROM OUR PARTNERS