• | 9:00 am

The era of worker empowerment on return to office mandates isn’t over. Here’s why

Amazon is just the latest company to push a return to office. Workers are fighting back.

The era of worker empowerment on return to office mandates isn’t over. Here’s why
[Source photo: TPopova/iStock/Getty Images Plus, M-A-U/iStock/Getty Images Plus]

Disney, Starbucks, Tesla, Google, and now Amazon are among the companies forcing employees back to the office.

Amazon made the announcement last week. CEO Andy Jassy and other senior executives said a policy of three days in the office starting May 1 would boost company culture by encouraging collaboration and learning among its workers. Employees pushed back against the mandate and started a petition that CNBC reports about 5,000 workers have signed already.

Others are claiming they need to do so for the sake of productivity. For example, Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, claimed that those working remotely only “pretend to work” and are “phoning it in.” Others say you need to be in the office to innovate: Disney’s CEO Bob Iger demanded the return to the office because “nothing can replace the ability to connect, observe, and create with peers that comes from being physically together.”

However, in reality, extensive research shows remote workers are more productive than those in the office, not less. And you get more ideas and more novel ideas through techniques for innovation and creativity that are adapted to remote work.

So what explains the situation? As a globally known expert in the field of hybrid and remote work, I have seen firsthand how working remotely, whether part of the week or full-time, enables worker power through facilitating autonomy, decentralizing power, and preventing micromanagement.

Unfortunately, too many old-school managers like Iger and Musk prefer a rigid, top-down power structure. Musk is well-known as an extreme micromanager.

Such an authoritarian approach is well-suited to the assembly line model of the early 20th century, but not for a modern knowledge economy. That’s why we’re seeing employees use worker power to fight against these authoritarian mandates.


YouTube contractors in Texas went on strike in protest of rules requiring such workers to report to the office. The workers, who are technically employed by Cognizant, were notified of the Feb. 6 return-to-office date in November. The vast majority of the contractors were hired during the pandemic and have always worked remotely. Workers say their pay, which starts at around $19 per hour, isn’t enough to cover the costs of relocating to and living in Austin.

The workers’ strike came after they filed a prior month for union recognition, leading some to conclude the move was being made in retaliation. The workers are also seeking to have Google and Cognizant recognized as joint employers.

The New Mexico State Personnel Office ordered state employees working remotely to return to in-person work at the start of the new year. Many voiced their frustrations against the order, citing issues with commute, health, poor in-person work conditions, lack of childcare, and low pay, among other things. State workers rallied against the state’s return-to-office order at the roundhouse in Santa Fe. Dan Secrist, president of CWA Local 7076, said the state’s return-to-office mandate has worsened problems it was intended to solve while creating new ones.

The Canadian Federal government ordered public service employees to return to the office up to three days per week. A recent survey of nearly 14,000 public service workers revealed close to 75 percent of government employees would rather work from home. Marc Brière serves as the national president for the Union of Taxation Employees, which represents some 37,000 workers with Canada Revenue Agency. He says it is unnecessary for the majority of employees to return to the office.


These cases illustrate the increasing tension between employers and workers, particularly over the return to the office. The pandemic has accelerated the trend toward remote work, and workers are now resisting the idea of returning to the office. Many workers have become accustomed to the flexibility and freedom that come with remote work, and employers who refuse to allow it are facing backlash.

Employers are forcing their employees back to the office to impose control over workers, but they are failing to recognize that remote work enables worker power. In fact, remote work is empowering workers by giving them more control over their lives and work. With remote work, workers can choose where and when to work, which gives them more control over their schedules and their work-life balance.

Employers who are forcing their employees back to the office are trying to reassert control over their workers, but finding that it is backfiring. Workers are pushing back against these efforts, and many are organizing to protect their rights and interests. Employers who refuse to recognize this trend risk alienating their workers and facing the consequences.


The drive to return employees to the office to regain control over employees is a prime example of how cognitive biases can lead to poor decision-making. Cognitive biases are mental shortcuts that we use to process information quickly and efficiently. They can lead us to make decisions that are not based on facts or rational thought, but on our personal beliefs, emotions, and past experiences.

One of the most common cognitive biases at play in return to office mandates is confirmation bias. This is the tendency to seek out and interpret information in a way that confirms our preexisting beliefs or biases. Employers who are determined to bring their employees back to the office are more likely to seek out information that supports this decision, while ignoring or downplaying information that contradicts it. This can lead them to make decisions that are not in the best interests of their organizations by harming relations with employees, leading both to challenges with retention and resistance by employees.

Another cognitive bias that is prevalent in this context is the status quo bias. This is the tendency to prefer things to stay the way they are, rather than change. Employers who are used to having their employees work in the office may be resistant to change, even if remote work has proven to be effective and beneficial for their employees. They may be more inclined to return to the office simply because it is the way things have always been done, rather than because it is the best decision for their employees or their organization.

It is time for employers to recognize the value of remote work and to work with their employees to create hybrid or remote work arrangements that meet the needs of both parties. Employers who do so will enjoy a happier and more productive workforce, while those who refuse to adapt risk falling behind in a rapidly changing world.

Remote work enables worker power, and employers who recognize this fact will be better positioned to succeed in the years ahead. As a manager, it is important to listen to your employees and to work with them to create the best possible work environment for all. By doing so, you can create a strong and vibrant workplace culture that will help you succeed in the long run.

  Be in the Know. Subscribe to our Newsletters.


Gleb Tsipursky, PhD, is the CEO of Disaster Avoidance Experts. He is the author of seven7 books, including Never Go With Your Gut: How Pioneering Leaders Make the Best Decisions and Avoid Business Disasters and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams: A Manual on Benchmarking to Best Practices for Competitive Advantage. More